In 1967 rumours of a merger between BMC and Leyland
had begun to surface and Issigonis was keen to have a smaller car developed
just in case new management might have a different view from Harriman's.
Issigonis arranged for Pininfarina to be sent an 1100 platform from Innocenti,
which assembled the car in Milan. Fioravanti was keen to show that the same aerodynamic
shape and proportions, applied to the original 1800 concept could be transferred to a
smaller car.
BMC had figured that if reaction was good the car could go into production very quickly.
The motoring press had been criticising the present family saloons of looking alike and
sharing the same three box design. BMC's 1100, 1300 and 1800 range was an exception to the
trend, they were beginning to look "dumpy".
Pininfarina had in effect suggested the next step for the BMC transverse engine, front drive
layout, and would go a long way to meeting the anticipated needs of motoring in the early '70s.
These thoughts were echoed by Autocar who wrote: "a demonstration that so far as styling for the
'70s is concerned, this it the kind of shape we shall all be driving". Something BMC/BL should have
picked up on and run with, but sadly the BL management under Lord Stokes wanted nothing to do with
either an ultra-advanced small car or Pininfarina. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Good all round vision, this could have been the start of the safest cars on Britain's roads... |
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the biggest failing of the car
is the length of the nose. It could be considered that if
this was cut down in size it would perhaps spoil the clean
lines. However, Citroen managed this with the GS and ended up
with a fantastic product.
Four selling points of the car were:
Spacious interior for passengers and luggage.
Good aerodynamics, with blending lines for minimum wind
resistance and silence.
Big windows all round for good outlook and safety.
Simplicity of line, no bright metal, no radiator grille,
rubber bumpers and enclosed headlamps.
The interior was also designed with safety in mind.
There were padded and rounded surfaces and edges and
recessed into the dashboard. Headrests were fitted the
seats in order to make the car safer in the event of an
accident. In addition to safety features the car also
featured a central locking device to all five doors
in order to lock them at the flick of a switch. Ideal
for night time driving, or those less desirable areas. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
The ADO16
version of the aerodynamic saloon
|
The
rubber bumpers perhaps a basis for SRV5?
|
The
larger aerodynamic saloon based on the 1800.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The boot in
the aerodynamic saloon was slightly more accessible than in
ADO16, but the rear valance could be a hindrance to the load
space. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The steering
column is mounted on a double knuckle to allow it to adjust to
suit the driver. The controls are easy to access and the
level of padding in the passenger cabin can be clearly seen. |
|
|
|
|
BL gave up on the idea, but Citroen were quick to jump on the
idea. Whether or not Pininfarina had anything to do with it remains open to debate.
I'm sure you'll agree the GS looks more European version. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Rover SD1 |
| |
David Bache appeared to use the Aerodynamic saloon to base the SD1 on.
Granted it has been brought up to date, but a number of the original features still are
in there! |
|
|
|
|
|
| |